- The Pragmatic Investor
- Posts
- Pragmatic Friday: ⚡Why Wednesday’s Rate Cut Terrified Me, Not Excited Me
Pragmatic Friday: ⚡Why Wednesday’s Rate Cut Terrified Me, Not Excited Me

🌞 Good Morning, Pragmatic Thinkers!
The market cheered a rate cut on Wednesday and then sold it off like bad inventory by Thursday. That’s not strength — that’s confusion dressed up as conviction. When you get what you asked for and still can’t hold a rally, it tells you everything you need to know about where the real money is moving.
Everyone obsessed over the Fed’s “risk management” language, as if Powell invented a new playbook. What barely registered? 911,000 phantom jobs erased in the biggest payroll revision on record. That’s not a detail. That’s a credibility crisis.
The uncomfortable truth: the Fed has been flying blind for over a year, steering monetary policy with instruments that weren’t even calibrated. You can call that prudent, you can call it risk-aware, but let’s not kid ourselves — it’s damage control.
Meanwhile, traders tried to make this week about a single cut, about whether it means another is coming, or whether it’s bullish or bearish for tech. All of that is noise. The signal is that the scaffolding under last year’s “resilient economy” narrative just collapsed.
That’s where my attention stays — not on what moved the tape intraday, but on what reshapes the setup for months ahead. Phantom jobs, sticky inflation, and a Fed that just admitted uncertainty out loud are not blips. They’re regime-defining signals.
So in The Pragmatic Playbook, I’ll cut through the drama and lay out how to position when the pilots admit they’ve been reading the wrong gauges. Because clarity doesn’t come from watching the crowd — it comes from seeing what they refuse to face.
🔥 Market Pulse – What Actually Mattered
An AARP expert dropped research-backed tactics that don’t just preserve wealth—they extend health span past 50. Most retirement advice focuses on asset growth; what this week reminded me is the cost of ignoring longevity and health will eat into every projection. If you're over 50 (or investing for someone who is), skipping this turns what seems like good planning into regret down the road.
There are dividend stocks promising ~10.5% paid monthly—sounds juicy. But “safe” is always relative. High yield in this environment often hides credit risk, limited upside, or payout sustainability questions. Jumping in blindly for income can trap you when rates move or the business model cracks.
Beijing banning companies like ByteDance and Alibaba from buying certain Nvidia chips isn’t just export control posture—it’s a signal that the AI hardware dominance game is fracturing. For a company like Nvidia, this undercuts assumed global demand and raises the risk of regional competitors catching up. Everyone talking about AI tailwinds... they need to price in the possibility that a huge chunk of one region just got turned off.
TOGETHER WITH OUR PARTNER
Peak Rates on the Products You Need
Peak Bank was designed for those who want to bank boldly, providing a 100 percent digital platform that combines convenience and powerful money management tools. Our high-yield savings accounts offer rates as high as 4.35% APY* while remaining accessible and flexible, ensuring you stay in control at all times. Apply online to start your ascent.
Member FDIC
🎯 The Pragmatic Playbook: The Fed Just Revealed They’ve Been Flying Blind - And Your Portfolio Is About To Feel It

The Fed cut rates Wednesday for the first time since December. Powell called it a “risk management cut.” Every time I hear that phrase, my stomach drops.
Here’s the brutal truth: the U.S. economy had 911,000 fewer jobs than originally reported as of March 2025.
That’s not a typo. That’s 0.6% of all payrolls - triple the average revision of the past decade. It means the Fed has been making policy decisions based on phantom job growth for over a year.
Powell admitted as much: “While the unemployment rate remains low, it has edged up, job gains have slowed, and downside risks to employment have risen.” Translation: we’ve been flying blind, and now we’re scrambling.
The market reaction told you everything. Stocks spiked on the cut - the Dow popped 200 points - and then sold off hard. When you beg for rate cuts, get them, and still can’t hold a rally? That’s institutional money exiting while retail cheers.
🧠 What It Triggered In Me
This setup triggered every scar-tissue alarm I’ve built over 20 years of watching central banks pretend they’re in control.
The Fed isn’t cutting because the economy can handle easier policy. They’re cutting because the data they relied on was garbage.
I’ve seen this movie before. In 2007, the Fed kept insisting subprime was “contained.” It wasn’t. The pattern is identical: reacting to backward-looking data that was wrong from the start.
Powell even admitted: “There are no risk-free paths now.” That’s Fed-speak for: we don’t have a roadmap anymore.
This isn’t monetary policy. It’s damage control dressed up as strategy.
And here’s the kicker: Powell used every psychological trick in the book. “Risk management” (sounds prudent). “Data-dependent” (sounds scientific). “Gradual” (sounds measured). Strip away the packaging and you’re left with a Fed making calls off data that overstated jobs by nearly a million.
Your brain wants to believe the Fed has this under control. Your portfolio can’t afford that delusion.
📊 The Setup I’m Tracking
Here’s what matters now:
We’re in a dual mandate crisis. Inflation is still “somewhat elevated.” Jobs are weaker than reported. That’s the stagflation playbook - sticky prices with slowing growth.
911,000 phantom jobs. 76,000 fewer jobs created every single month.
For over a year, markets priced in “resilient employment” that justified keeping rates high. Every Powell speech, every FOMC meeting, every dot plot was built on data that simply wasn’t real.
Now reality is catching up. And the Fed is behind the curve by design.
The tape tells the story: smart money sold into Wednesday’s rally. Sustained selling after “good news” isn’t random. It’s distribution - institutions unloading risk while retail buys the narrative.
Housing? Don’t expect relief. Powell admitted inflation “may move up, maybe not as much as before.” That means lower rates won’t translate to meaningful mortgage relief. You’re getting smaller payments while affordability stays crushed. Worst of both worlds.
Corporate earnings? Built on sand. S&P 500 guidance assumed strong job creation that never existed. Revenues built on phantom wages will miss in reality. That’s the earnings revision cycle nobody’s modeling yet.
🚨 What I’ll Do - And What Would Stop Me
I’m positioning for a world where the Fed cuts not because it wants to - but because it has no choice. Every cut exposes how badly they’ve misread the economy.
Here’s my framework:
Quality first. Companies with pricing power, fortress balance sheets, and dividends they can defend. Utilities, consumer staples, moated aristocrats. The stuff your grandparents owned when central banks lost credibility.
Defensive real estate. Healthcare REITs, data centers, infrastructure. Sectors with cash flows insulated from discretionary spending. Avoid retail, office, and residential that depend on job strength we just learned doesn’t exist.
Fixed income with inflation protection. TIPS, I-Bonds, short-duration Treasuries. Instruments that gain from cuts but won’t implode if inflation resurges.
The neuromarketing angle here is anchoring bias. Most investors are still anchored to the “resilient employment” story. The 911k revision is the new anchor. Every assumption built on the old one is now invalid.
What confirms my thesis?
Layoffs accelerating as companies recalibrate to real conditions.
Credit spreads widening as earnings miss expectations.
The Fed forced into a 50bp cut because data deteriorates faster than they anticipated.
What would stop me?
Genuine economic acceleration that validates the easing cycle.
Earnings beating revised-down expectations.
Inflation sliding back to trend without destroying jobs.
But here’s my non-negotiable: I won’t trust Fed communication until they prove they can read the economy correctly. Wednesday’s selloff wasn’t about the cut. It was about recognizing the Fed has been flying without instruments for over a year.
This isn’t a soft landing. It’s a controlled crash - and the pilots just admitted they’ve been reading the wrong gauges.
TOGETHER WITH OUR PARTNER
Run IRL ads as easily as PPC
AdQuick unlocks the benefits of Out Of Home (OOH) advertising in a way no one else has. Approaching the problem with eyes to performance, created for marketers with the engineering excellence you’ve come to expect for the internet.
Marketers agree OOH is one of the best ways for building brand awareness, reaching new customers, and reinforcing your brand message. It’s just been difficult to scale. But with AdQuick, you can plan, deploy and measure campaigns as easily as digital ads, making them a no-brainer to add to your team’s toolbox.
You can learn more at AdQuick.com
🧠 What did you think of today's newsletter? |
🧘The Friday Reset
Weeks like this can leave you feeling like the market is a noisy casino — rate cuts spun as good news, revisions spinning the other way, and pundits rushing to tell you what it all “means.” That fatigue is real. The hardest part of investing isn’t the volatility itself, it’s the temptation to let the crowd’s mood swings dictate your own. When everything feels urgent, clarity is usually hiding in the background, waiting for the noise to pass.
What I remind myself — and you — is simple: my edge doesn’t come from predicting every twist. It comes from preparing for the setups that endure. Hype never lasts, but discipline compounds. If it feels like you’re behind, you’re not — you’re early, because you’re refusing to chase. When the market slows down, real clarity speeds up. The job isn’t to outrun the chaos. It’s to stand still long enough to see the signal for what it is.
Stay Sharp,
— AK

Disclaimer: The content on this blog is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. Investing in the stock market involves risks, including the loss of principal. The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not represent any company or organization. Readers should conduct their own research and due diligence before making any financial decisions. The author and publisher are not responsible for any losses or damages resulting from the use of this information.



Reply