Pragmatic Friday: ⚔️ Rivals Are Saving Intel - Not Killing It

In partnership with

🌞 Good Morning, Pragmatic Thinkers!

Wall Street spent the week cheering rate-cut whispers and panicking over daily swings in oil and yields — as if those micro-moves were the whole story. But here’s the thing: markets love drama because it feels tradable. The truth is, most of what trended this week won’t matter a month from now.

What did matter? Intel — the company everyone left for dead — suddenly became the most important chip stock in the world. Not because of its earnings, not because of its chart, but because Nvidia, SoftBank, and even Washington decided it was too strategic to fail. That’s not a headline. That’s a signal.

The crowd still treats Intel as a relic. But when your fiercest rival invests billions, when governments underwrite your future, and when Apple is even rumored to be circling — that’s no longer a sideshow. That’s the kind of quiet shift that reorders the chessboard.

I’m not saying Intel is fixed. Far from it. But the market is still missing the setup: a hated stock with strategic backers, asymmetric upside, and downside cushioned by subsidies. That’s what people should have been talking about this week — not another Fed guess.

So let’s clear away the noise. This week’s focus isn’t about the drama of rate cuts or daily market mood swings. It’s about the bigger, contrarian story hiding in plain sight: Intel’s resurrection, and what it means for anyone paying attention.

🔥 Market Pulse – What Actually Mattered This Week

📊 Powell Admits Stocks Look “Fairly Highly Valued”
Fed Chair Jerome Powell finally said the quiet part out loud: equity markets look rich. When the central banker who’s been fueling the rally hints valuations are stretched, that’s not noise—it’s a credibility warning. The signal? The Fed is quietly setting the stage to let some air out of the balloon, and ignoring it could mean being the bagholder when sentiment shifts.

🧓 Washington’s Push To Reshape Social Security Is No Sideshow
Lawmakers are floating two major changes to Social Security that could alter benefits and payroll tax structures. It’s easy to dismiss as politics, but for retirees and future investors, this is structural risk that directly changes household cash flow. The market rarely prices in retirement policy until it bites—by then, it’s too late to hedge.

⚖️ Fed Divide Widens On Rate Cuts—That’s The Real Risk
Some Fed policymakers want deeper cuts, others are warning against moving too fast—the consensus is splintering. That fracture is more dangerous than the cut itself, because it signals policy volatility. Markets love clarity; division breeds doubt. If you’re positioned as if the Fed is a monolith, you’re underestimating how messy this cycle can get.

TOGETHER WITH OUR PARTNER

Marketing ideas for marketers who hate boring

The best marketing ideas come from marketers who live it.

That’s what this newsletter delivers.

The Marketing Millennials is a look inside what’s working right now for other marketers. No theory. No fluff. Just real insights and ideas you can actually use—from marketers who’ve been there, done that, and are sharing the playbook.

Every newsletter is written by Daniel Murray, a marketer obsessed with what goes into great marketing. Expect fresh takes, hot topics, and the kind of stuff you’ll want to steal for your next campaign.

Because marketing shouldn’t feel like guesswork. And you shouldn’t have to dig for the good stuff.

🎯 The Pragmatic Playbook: Intel’s Resurrection - From Punchline to Contrarian Play

Intel was left for dead. Once the undisputed king of semiconductors, it missed mobile, bungled GPUs, fell behind TSMC, and let AMD carve away its market share. Its “tick-tock” cycle broke, margins collapsed, and investors walked away. For years, Intel wasn’t just ignored — it was ridiculed.

Now the tide is shifting. Nvidia, the very company that eclipsed it, has written a $5 billion check. SoftBank is betting too. Washington has called Intel a cornerstone of national security and put money behind that claim. And reports suggest Intel is courting Apple to join the table.

When rivals, governments, and potential customers all start betting on a company Wall Street abandoned, you pay attention. This isn’t nostalgia. It’s strategy.

From Titan to Underdog

At its peak, Intel owned 80%+ of the PC CPU market and printed margins north of 60%. Then came the stumble:

  • AMD surged, capturing 40%+ of server CPUs.

  • Nvidia turned GPUs into the AI engine of the world.

  • TSMC leapt ahead on manufacturing nodes, while Intel delayed roadmap after roadmap.

  • Revenue fell from $79B in 2021 to $54B in 2023, with gross margins slipping below 40%.

And yet… even at its “worst,” Intel still does over $50 billion in sales annually — more than AMD by a wide margin. It still owns fabs, it still has scale, and it still has the balance sheet to fight. That’s why the money is coming back.

🏗️ Why Capital Is Flowing Back

The sudden rush of support isn’t about nostalgia for Intel’s past. It’s about necessity.

  1. Geopolitics — The U.S. can’t depend on Taiwan forever. Intel’s Arizona and Ohio fabs are Washington’s hedge against geopolitical risk.

  2. Foundry Ambition — Intel is reinventing itself as a manufacturer-for-hire through Intel Foundry Services (IFS). If it works, Intel goes from laggard to indispensable.

  3. Too Strategic to Fail — Chips are the new oil. Intel isn’t just a company; it’s infrastructure. Rivals and governments alike know it.

That’s why Nvidia, SoftBank, and the U.S. government are lining up. They’re not buying a stock — they’re securing a future.

🏰 Nvidia’s Hedge: Rival and Partner

Nvidia’s move looks bizarre — why would a rival fund its competitor? The truth is pragmatic.

  • Nvidia depends almost entirely on TSMC, which is at capacity.

  • Intel offers diversification — a second source if Taiwan risk ever erupts.

  • For Nvidia, $5B is insurance, not charity. At a $2.5T market cap, the downside is trivial, the optionality is enormous.

Nvidia doesn’t need Intel to dominate — it just needs Intel to exist. That’s still a lifeline for shareholders.

🌍 SoftBank, Uncle Sam, and Maybe Apple

SoftBank’s play is classic Masayoshi Son: bet on infrastructure that underpins the future. ARM, data centers, now Intel fabs. Intel fits perfectly.

The U.S. government’s stake is about power, not profit. The $52B CHIPS Act is effectively Intel’s safety net. Few companies in the world have Washington underwriting their future.

Apple is the swing factor. Right now, it relies almost exclusively on TSMC for its custom silicon. That’s efficient but dangerous. A second supplier in Intel would give Apple leverage and resilience. If Apple signs, Intel’s credibility as a foundry changes overnight.

💸 Intel by the Numbers

Here’s where Intel stands:

  • Market Cap: ~$160B (vs Nvidia’s $2.5T, TSMC’s ~$500B).

  • Forward P/E: ~27x (cheaper than Nvidia at ~35x, but with slower growth).

  • Capex: $25–30B annually for fabs — the most aggressive bet in its history.

  • Margins: <40% today vs historic 60%+. Getting back above 45–50% would be game-changing.

This is what makes Intel unique: massive sales, hated by investors, but backed by partners and governments who refuse to let it die.

🔄 Revival or Value Trap?

The investor dilemma is clear:

  • Bull Case: Intel executes on its fabs, wins Apple, and proves it can deliver foundry services at scale. Subsidies + partners create a floor, upside could be 2–3x over the decade.

  • Bear Case: Intel overpromises, underdelivers, and stays stuck as a subsidized laggard. The stock remains dead money.

Either way, the asymmetric setup is real. Most of the bad news is already priced in. The upside, if Intel pulls it off, is not.

📊 The Investor Lens

Here’s what I’m watching:

  1. Apple’s Move — The tipping point. If Apple signs on, Intel’s story flips instantly.

  2. Fab Execution — Arizona and Ohio need to stay on track. Slippage = credibility hit.

  3. CPU Share vs. AMD — The core business still funds everything. Stabilization here is critical.

  4. Margins — A climb back to 45–50% would signal the comeback is real.

🚀 Actionable Moves

  • Contrarian Upside: Intel (INTC) is hated, cheap relative to peers, and asymmetric. If execution improves even modestly, the stock rerates higher.

  • Safer Hedge: Nvidia (NVDA) and AMD (AMD) are still the winners either way — they benefit whether Intel turns around or not.

  • Diversified Play: Semiconductor ETFs like SOXX or SMH give you Intel exposure without concentrated risk.

🔮 Looking Ahead

Intel isn’t just another chip stock anymore. It’s a national project, a rival’s hedge, and maybe Apple’s insurance policy. That makes it unique. Everyone from Washington to Nvidia has a reason to keep it alive.

The upside is simple: if Intel executes even halfway, this becomes one of the most surprising turnarounds in tech. The downside is cushioned — subsidies and partnerships mean the floor is higher than most give credit for.

For investors, that’s the contrarian opportunity. A hated stock, backed by giants, with asymmetric upside. The kind of setup you only see once in a cycle.

TOGETHER WITH OUR PARTNER

Used by Execs at Google and OpenAI

Join 400,000+ professionals who rely on The AI Report to work smarter with AI.

Delivered daily, it breaks down tools, prompts, and real use cases—so you can implement AI without wasting time.

If they’re reading it, why aren’t you?

🧠 What did you think of today's newsletter?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

🧘The Friday Reset

Intel’s sudden revival has the market buzzing — rivals investing, governments backing, Apple circling. The chatter makes it feel urgent, like you either jump in now or miss the comeback of the decade. That’s the fatigue of Friday talking: the market takes a complex story and squeezes it into a simple ultimatum. But urgency isn’t clarity.

The real edge isn’t in chasing Intel’s headlines, it’s in preparing for the signals that prove whether the turnaround is real — margins stabilizing, fabs delivering, Apple committing. If it feels like you’re behind, you’re not. You’re just early to a story the crowd is still trying to simplify. Hype doesn’t last. Setups do. And when the noise dies down, that’s when the best entries reveal themselves.

Stay Sharp,

— AK

Disclaimer: The content on this blog is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. Investing in the stock market involves risks, including the loss of principal. The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not represent any company or organization. Readers should conduct their own research and due diligence before making any financial decisions. The author and publisher are not responsible for any losses or damages resulting from the use of this information.

Reply

or to participate.