This week, the market did what it does best when it gets uncomfortable: it confused spending with weakness and called it “discipline.” Microsoft didn’t get sold because the business broke. It got sold because investors suddenly remembered that building the future costs money, and nobody likes paying upfront for something they can’t model neatly yet.

That’s the uncomfortable truth most people miss. A stock can drop hard and still be attached to one of the strongest businesses on the planet. Price can look terrible while the engine underneath it is still doing exactly what it’s supposed to do. But in a nervous tape, the crowd doesn’t price what is. It prices what it fears might happen next.

And what really mattered this week wasn’t the headline panic around AI spending. It was the fact that Microsoft still printed serious growth, still threw off real cash, and still looked like a company investing from a position of strength, not scrambling from a position of weakness. That distinction is everything.

This is also why investors get chopped up in names like this. They don’t lose money because the business changed overnight. They lose money because the stock stops feeling “safe,” and they let that feeling override the facts.

So I’m not here to give you another cute recap. I’m here to cut through the noise and reframe what actually matters when a great company starts trading like a problem.

In The Pragmatic Playbook, I’m going deep on Microsoft’s selloff: what the market is really punishing, what the numbers still say, and how to think clearly when the stock is bruised but the business is still compounding. Because the edge isn’t predicting the bottom. The edge is recognizing when the market is charging a fear tax… and deciding whether that fear is temporary or deserved.

Nvidia delivered another monster quarter, with revenue surging about 73% year over year to roughly $68 billion, powered overwhelmingly by data-center AI demand.
The results again confirmed Nvidia’s central role in the AI infrastructure boom, with enterprise and hyperscaler spending still running hot.
However, the market reaction shows expectations are already extremely high, meaning future moves may hinge more on forward guidance than backward-looking beats.

This piece highlights several Berkshire-favored names that smaller investors can realistically buy even with limited capital.
It points to companies like Apple, Kroger, and Bank of America, emphasizing durable business models and steady earnings power.
The broader message is classic Buffett: focus on quality businesses with staying power rather than chasing speculative high flyers.

A growing share of CEOs say they plan to hold headcount steady in 2026, reflecting caution amid tariffs, economic uncertainty, and rising AI adoption.
At the same time, companies are not rushing into layoffs either, partly because skilled labor remains relatively scarce.
The result is a labor market that looks stable on the surface but may mask slower hiring momentum beneath the headline numbers.

Founders spend too much time drafting the same kinds of messages. Wispr Flow turns spoken thinking into final-draft writing so you can record investor updates, product briefs, and run-of-the-mill status notes by voice. Use saved snippets for recurring intros, insert calendar links by voice, and keep comms consistent across the team. It preserves your tone, fixes punctuation, and formats lists so you send confident messages fast. Works on Mac, Windows, and iPhone. Try Wispr Flow for founders.

Start flowing free

Microsoft didn’t miss. It got punished anyway.

That’s the part that messes with people’s heads. A company can post a strong quarter, keep printing cash, and still get sold like it did something wrong. That’s what happens when a stock spends too long being treated like it can execute flawlessly forever. The moment friction shows up, the market stops applauding and starts charging interest.

And right now, that’s exactly what’s happening.

Microsoft is down roughly 28% from its 52-week high of $555.45 and recently traded around $400.60. That kind of drawdown makes people ask the wrong question first: “What broke?” The better question is: Did the business crack, or is the market simply charging Microsoft an AI tax while it builds the next leg of growth?

The honest answer? This still looks a lot more like a valuation reset than a broken business.

The market is not punishing Microsoft because the quarter was weak.

Microsoft’s fiscal Q2 2026 numbers were objectively strong: revenue was $81.3B, up 17% year over year, EPS was $4.14, and Microsoft Cloud crossed $50B in quarterly revenue. That is not a company falling apart. That is a giant still growing at a scale most businesses can’t even dream of.

Azure was still strong too, growing about 39% year over year. But this is where the market got moody: Azure growth was only slightly better than expected and guided to 37%–38% next quarter, which was close enough to consensus that it didn’t give investors the upside shock they wanted. In a normal stock, that’s fine. In Microsoft, that can be enough to trigger a selloff.

Then came the line Wall Street really hated: capital expenditures were about $37.5B in the quarter. That’s not incremental spending. That’s a company pouring concrete for an AI future the market wants to believe in, but doesn’t fully trust yet.

So let’s say it cleanly:

The company is compounding. The multiple is decompressing.

That’s why the stock is painful even while the business still looks elite.

The easy story is: “Azure slowed, AI spending is massive, maybe Microsoft’s best days are behind it.”

The harder, more useful story is this: Microsoft is doing what dominant businesses do when a platform shift shows up. It is spending aggressively before the payoff looks neat in the model.

That’s uncomfortable. It’s also normal.

And the clearest proof the machine is still intact is not some abstract “AI vision” deck. It’s the cash. Microsoft returned $12.7B to shareholders in the quarter through dividends and buybacks, up 32% year over year. Weak companies don’t fund that while also spending at this scale.

There’s also a deeper signal buried in the quarter: commercial remaining performance obligations rose 110% to $625B. That tells you customers are still committing serious future spend, even while the market is acting like demand is rolling over.

This is why I don’t buy the lazy “Microsoft is weakening” take.

The real issue is not whether Microsoft can still grow.
The real issue is whether investors are willing to sit through the period where costs show up first and AI monetization shows up more gradually.

That’s not a business survival problem.
That’s a patience problem.

And patience problems are exactly where great stocks can look terrible for a while.

If you own Microsoft, the wrong fear is:
“Maybe Microsoft is broken.”

The more honest fear is:
“Maybe the business stays great, but the stock stays heavy while the market keeps compressing the multiple.”

That happens more often than people think. A great business can still be a painful stock.

So what should actually worry you?

That’s the risk here. Not collapse. Not irrelevance. Just a longer, more annoying reset than most investors want to sit through.

And that’s exactly why people make bad decisions in names like this. They confuse a valuation reset with a broken thesis.

This is where most people either get too cute… or too emotional.

I’m not trying to catch Microsoft at the exact bottom. I’m trying to avoid confusing a falling stock with a “cheap” stock. Those are not the same thing.

So here’s the simple, price-first framework I’d use.

I’m not buying just because it’s down.

I want the stock to prove the selling is actually slowing.

Right now, Microsoft is around $400.60, and the stock just printed an ugly intraday range between roughly $383 and $397 in the latest session. That gives you a very clean map.

That’s the difference between a real reset and a dead-cat bounce.

This is where honesty matters more than confidence.

If you own Microsoft because it’s a dominant long-term compounder, the quarter didn’t break that thesis. But that doesn’t mean you ignore the chart while it’s clearly under pressure.

So I’m watching one simple thing:

Does Microsoft keep making lower lows, or does it finally start building higher lows?

If I’m too large and the drawdown is messing with my head, I reduce to a size that lets me think clearly again. That’s not bearish. That’s survival.

This is the level that keeps me honest:

If Microsoft breaks below the $383 area and cannot reclaim it quickly, I stop treating this like a clean reset and start respecting the idea that the market wants lower prices first.

That doesn’t mean the business is broken.

It means the stock is still being repriced, and I’d rather wait for the next real base than force conviction too early.

I don’t need 12 indicators.

I need to know three things:

Right now, that means:

That’s enough.

Because the goal isn’t to predict the exact turn.
The goal is to recognize when the market stops acting like Microsoft is a problem.

There are still three real reasons not to write Microsoft off.

1) The cloud base is enormous.
Crossing $50B in Microsoft Cloud revenue in one quarter matters because it gives Microsoft a massive installed base to monetize over time. This is not a company scrambling for relevance. It already owns critical infrastructure.

2) Microsoft can afford to wait longer than almost everyone else.
A lot of companies can talk about AI. Very few can spend at this level, keep the balance sheet intact, and still return $12.7B to shareholders in the same quarter. That is a real competitive advantage.

3) If the AI payoff starts showing up more clearly, sentiment can flip fast.
Right now the market sees cost first. Later, if it sees durable monetization and steadier cloud growth, the exact same investors acting nervous today will call the setup “obvious.”

That’s how this game works.

Microsoft’s selloff is real. It shouldn’t be dismissed. But the cleanest way to frame it is this:

Microsoft is paying the AI tax.

The market is charging it upfront for building the next platform shift, and investors are deciding whether that bill is temporary or structural.

If Azure keeps softening and the AI payoff stays vague, this reset can drag longer. If demand stabilizes, monetization gets clearer, and the stock stops getting sold on every bounce, this will look like a classic case of expensive excellence getting repriced before the next run.

So no, I’m not calling the bottom.

I’m watching for the moment a great business stops being treated like a problem.

Ready to transform artificial intelligence from a buzzword into your personal revenue generator

HubSpot’s groundbreaking guide "200+ AI-Powered Income Ideas" is your gateway to financial innovation in the digital age.

Inside you'll discover:

Download your guide today and unlock a future where artificial intelligence powers your success. Your next income stream is waiting.

Get Your Guide

Some weeks don’t feel like investing. They feel like emotional endurance tests. A stock like Microsoft can post strong numbers, get sold anyway, and suddenly your brain starts doing what tired brains do: chasing explanations, second-guessing conviction, and treating every red candle like a verdict. That’s the trap. The market gets noisy, the story gets distorted, and before long you’re reacting to mood instead of signal.

So here’s the reset I’m taking into the weekend: my edge doesn’t come from guessing, it comes from preparing. If it feels like you’re behind, you’re not. You’re just early. When the market slows down, real clarity speeds up, because the noise fades and the few things that actually matter become easier to see. Hype doesn’t last. Setups do. My job is not to predict the next headline. My job is to stay patient enough to recognize when a bruised stock is still attached to a business that’s doing the hard work of compounding.