In partnership with

🌞 Good Morning, Pragmatic Thinkers!

This week wasn’t about earnings. It was about expectations throwing a tantrum — and Robinhood (HOOD) became the perfect punching bag.

HOOD didn’t “collapse.” It grew. But the stock still got punished because the market didn’t get the dopamine hit it wanted. That’s the uncomfortable truth nobody likes to admit: sometimes the business is fine, and it’s the crowd that’s unstable.

The fake drama was everyone arguing whether Robinhood’s quarter was “good” or “bad.” The real story was simpler and more useful: the market is demanding perfection again. Not progress. Not direction. Perfection. And when perfection becomes the bar, even strong businesses can trade like they did something wrong.

This is how investors lose money in a bull market. Not because they picked the worst company — but because they let a volatile chart rewrite their conviction overnight. HOOD drops, Twitter screams, your brain spirals, and suddenly you’re reacting instead of thinking.

In today’s The Pragmatic Playbook, I’m going to break down what actually grew at Robinhood, what the market really hated (hint: it wasn’t “growth”), and why higher operating expenses can be a deliberate platform bet, not a red flag.

Then we turn it into something you can use: a clean lens for spotting valuation tantrums, a simple way to separate signal from sentiment, and an entry plan that doesn’t require bravery or prediction.

Because the goal isn’t to win the weekly argument. It’s to finish the week with a calmer brain and a sharper process — while everyone else is still chasing the noise.

🔥 Market Pulse – What Actually Mattered

🏥 Sanofi Ousts CEO Hudson, Names Belén Garijo as New Chief Executive
French pharma giant Sanofi announced a leadership shake-up, replacing outgoing CEO Paul Hudson with Belén Garijo, who previously led the company’s global vaccines and oncology divisions. The move comes amid pressure to reinvigorate growth after years of lagging peers in innovation and commercial execution. Investors will be watching how Garijo’s strategic priorities — particularly around R&D and pipeline acceleration — translate into performance in the coming quarters.

📈 Alphabet Stock: Is It Time to Buy the Dip?
Alphabet’s share price has pulled back from recent highs, prompting analysts to revisit the valuation and long-term growth drivers tied to search advertising, cloud computing and AI. The article highlights strong cash flow, dominating ad market share, and improving AI integration as reasons long-term investors might view the dip as a buying opportunity. The thesis is that Alphabet’s combination of innovation and balance-sheet strength provides a compelling base for renewed upside if earnings trends stabilize.

📊 These 32 Favorite Stocks Signal the Bull Market Is Running on Fumes
MarketWatch flags a cohort of 32 heavily-held names — spanning tech, consumer and growth sectors — that may reflect overextended sentiment and narrow leadership concentration in the broader market. Several of these stocks trade at valuations historically above long-term averages, suggesting sentiment could be outpacing fundamentals. For investors, this signals the importance of caution and diversification as markets push into late-cycle territory, even if major indices remain near highs.

TOGETHER WITH OUR PARTNER

The Tech newsletter for Engineers who want to stay ahead

Tech moves fast, but you're still playing catch-up?

That's exactly why 100K+ engineers working at Google, Meta, and Apple read The Code twice a week.

Here's what you get:

  • Curated tech news that shapes your career - Filtered from thousands of sources so you know what's coming 6 months early.

  • Practical resources you can use immediately - Real tutorials and tools that solve actual engineering problems.

  • Research papers and insights decoded - We break down complex tech so you understand what matters.

All delivered twice a week in just 2 short emails.

🎯 The Pragmatic Playbook: HOOD Down ~12% After Earnings… Should You Worry?

Let’s get this out of the way: the market is acting like Robinhood “disappointed.”

But when I read the actual earnings package, I don’t see a weak business. I see a business that grew across most of the core lines, printed record annual revenue, pulled in real deposits, and kept building toward the endgame: becoming a full financial platform, not just a trading app.

I’ll be honest: when HOOD dropped, my first reaction was the same as everyone else’s.
“What did I miss?”
Then I looked. And the answer wasn’t some hidden disaster.

The one line that explains the selloff isn’t revenue.
It’s operating expenses.

This wasn’t a bad quarter. This was a valuation tantrum.

🧠 The One-Line Thesis

The market punished HOOD because it didn’t grow “fast enough,” and because management chose to spend more now to build a broader platform later.

Wall Street didn’t hate growth. It hated the timeline.

And that’s exactly where mispricings tend to show up.

📌 What Actually Grew (3 Proof Points That Matter)

Here’s what stood out to me, without drowning you in a spreadsheet.

1) Top-line growth is still real

Quarterly net revenue came in around $1.28B, up roughly 27% year over year. Full-year net revenue was about $4.5B, up roughly 52% year over year.

That’s not a “stalling company.” That’s a company still compounding.

2) The platform is getting bigger and stickier

Total platform assets ended the year around $324B, and net deposits for the year were roughly $68B (with a chunky chunk landing in the latest quarter).

Deposits are not a vanity metric. Deposits are gravity. When money sits on a platform, it creates repeat business even when trading slows.

3) The paid relationship is growing

Robinhood Gold subscribers grew to around 4.2M.

This matters more than most people admit because it’s a signal of willingness to pay, not just willingness to trade. That’s how platforms mature.

So yes, the business grew.

Now here’s the part most people misread.

😒 What The Market Didn’t Like (And Why I Think It’s Shortsighted)

The market wanted “growth” and “discipline” and “higher margins” and “lower costs” all at the same time.

That’s not a business plan. That’s a fantasy.

Two things drove the punishment:

1) Revenue wasn’t “perfect”

The quarter came in a bit below what the Street wanted. Not catastrophic, but not a clean victory either.

Growth stocks don’t get graded on “good.” They get graded on “beat.”

2) Operating expenses went up… and investors assumed it meant margin damage

Operating expenses rose meaningfully year over year, and management guided to higher operating costs ahead.

This is where the market reaction makes sense… and also misses the point.

The market is treating higher opex like a problem.
I’m treating it like a bet.

A deliberate bet to expand Robinhood’s product surface area and build out auxiliary services that make the platform harder to leave.

Spending is only scary when you don’t believe in the product.

🔥 My Conviction View: HOOD Is Building The “Money App,” Not Just A Trading App

If you need a stock that behaves politely after earnings, HOOD will annoy you. It always has. It trades like a mood ring because expectations swing faster than fundamentals.

But the business itself is doing something important:

  • shifting from “transaction bursts” to “ongoing relationship”

  • building paid subscriptions and deeper services

  • expanding capability so the customer doesn’t have to leave the ecosystem

This is what I mean when I say I like the company’s direction: they’re choosing to invest through the awkward middle. The part where Wall Street is impatient, but the platform is being built.

That’s not comfortable.
It’s also how real platforms win.

And here’s the trap investors fall into: they let one earnings reaction talk them out of a business that’s still improving.

The biggest mistake with HOOD isn’t buying late.
It’s letting short-term disappointment scare you out of long-term compounding.

⚠️ Here’s What Would Actually Worry Me (3 Mind-Changers Only)

I’m bullish, but I’m not blind. If these show up, I stop adding and reassess:

  1. Deposits and platform assets stop growing (that would break the “gravity” story)

  2. Paid relationships stall (Gold stagnates or reverses)

  3. Opex rises but the product expansion doesn’t translate into stickier behavior (meaning more spend, no stronger ecosystem)

Notice what’s not on the list: “stock went down.”

Price alone isn’t a thesis breaker.
Broken business signals are.

🛠️ The Playbook

Current price is around the mid-$70s, after the post-earnings drop. The tape is volatile, so your process matters more than your opinion.

🟩 If You’re Investing (6–18 Months)

This is not a “buy it all now” situation. This is a build with structure situation.

Position sizing

  • Starter: 25–33% of intended size

  • Add: only when price confirms buyers are back

  • Full size: only after the trend proves itself again

Execution rules

  • I’m comfortable starting small if HOOD stabilizes in the mid-$70s (not while it’s still sliding daily).

  • I add if HOOD reclaims ~$80 and holds for 2 daily closes. That’s my “buyers are back” signal.

  • If HOOD breaks lower and can’t reclaim the mid-$70s within a few sessions, I pause adding. No ego averaging.

This keeps you from buying “because it feels cheap.” You buy because the market starts agreeing with you.

🟦 If You’re Trading (2–6 Weeks)

You’re not predicting. You’re reacting.

What I want to see

  • Stabilization near current levels

  • A push back above recent supply near ~$79–$80

  • Follow-through after the breakout attempt

Entry trigger

  • Small entry only after it reclaims ~$79–$80 with strength

  • If it pops above and instantly fades back under, I don’t chase. That’s a trap zone.

Risk

  • If I take a trade and it breaks down again quickly, I’m out. HOOD punishes hesitation.

Boring rule, but it saves money: no follow-through, no size.

🧩 My Take

The market isn’t saying “HOOD is broken.”

It’s saying: “We’re not paying peak hype prices for ‘pretty good’ when expenses are rising.”

Fair.

But here’s where I’m different: I’m okay with higher opex if it’s buying future optionality. If it’s building a deeper ecosystem. If it’s turning Robinhood from a trading moment into a money habit.

That’s what strong businesses do. They spend to widen the moat while the crowd is busy complaining about the quarter.

So no, I’m not panicking at a ~12% drop.

I’m watching two things:

  • Is the platform still getting bigger?

  • Is the company building a stickier relationship, not just a trading spike?

If yes, the market’s impatience is not a warning sign.

It’s the opportunity.

TOGETHER WITH OUR PARTNER

Go from AI overwhelmed to AI savvy professional

AI will eliminate 300 million jobs in the next 5 years.

Yours doesn't have to be one of them.

Here's how to future-proof your career:

  • Join the Superhuman AI newsletter - read by 1M+ professionals

  • Learn AI skills in 3 mins a day

  • Become the AI expert on your team

🧠 What did you think of today's newsletter?

Login or Subscribe to participate

🧘The Friday Reset

The exhausting part about weeks like this isn’t the volatility. It’s the mental noise that comes with it. A solid business prints real growth, the stock still drops, and suddenly everyone around you is either panicking or victory-lapping like they knew it all along. That’s when you start second-guessing yourself, not because your thesis changed, but because the market got louder than your plan. If it feels like you’re behind, you’re not. You’re just early, and early always feels uncomfortable when the crowd is emotional.

This is where I reset by getting boring on purpose. My edge doesn’t come from guessing, it comes from preparing: levels, sizing, and clear “if this, then that” rules before the next headline hits. When the market slows down, real clarity speeds up, because you finally have room to think without reacting. I don’t need to win the argument this week, I just need to protect my process so I can be in position when the setup shows up. Signal over sentiment, every time. Hype doesn’t last. Setups do.

Stay Sharp,

— AK

Disclaimer: The content on this blog is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. Investing in the stock market involves risks, including the loss of principal. The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not represent any company or organization. Readers should conduct their own research and due diligence before making any financial decisions. The author and publisher are not responsible for any losses or damages resulting from the use of this information.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading