Midweek Deep Dive: 🚩 Intel’s News: What They’re Not Telling You

In partnership with

šŸŒž Good Morning, Folks!

The headlines make it sound like Intel is staging a comeback. SoftBank takes a stake. Washington dangles a 10% ownership slice. Analysts call it ā€œrevival mode.ā€ But here’s what no one’s saying out loud: if Intel were truly back, it wouldn’t need this much help propping it up.

That’s the disconnect I can’t ignore. The market is treating every government grant and partnership announcement as proof of strength. But to me, those look more like life support. When Uncle Sam has to step in, it doesn’t mean Intel is winning — it means the hole is deeper than most want to admit.

This week, I’m digging into Intel’s latest moves and why investors should be careful confusing subsidies with strategy. The noise will tell you Intel is turning the corner. The signal? Execution, margins, and market share still aren’t adding up.

Let’s get into it in This Week’s Focus.

🌐 From Around the Web

Wall Street is betting one stock could crack the $2 trillion or $3 trillion valuation club alongside Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and Alphabet. It's bold—but reminds me to watch winning momentum, not just hype. If you're not scanning for potential long-term winners beneath the noise, you may only see their tailwinds… not the setup.

Jerome Powell may not deliver a rate cut this week—but the signals he sends could shape Fed policy for years. If markets assume he’ll cut and he doesn’t, or if he hints at a framework shift back toward strict inflation targeting, that divergence might reshape risk assets. This isn’t just about rate cuts—it’s about regime change in expectations.

The U.S. may convert chip subsidies into equity stakes in firms like Intel, Micron, TSMC, even Samsung. This is beyond industrial policy—it’s shareholder intervention. If Washington starts owning pieces of your favorite chip plays, that changes the entire risk-reward dynamic—and not in a benign way.

TOGETHER WITH OUR PARTNER

You Don’t Need to Be Technical. Just Informed

AI isn’t optional anymore—but coding isn’t required.

The AI Report gives business leaders the edge with daily insights, use cases, and implementation guides across ops, sales, and strategy.

Trusted by professionals at Google, OpenAI, and Microsoft.

šŸ‘‰ Get the newsletter and make smarter AI decisions.

šŸ” This Week’s Focus: šŸ’„ Why Intel Still Looks Weak (Even With SoftBank’s $2B and Uncle Sam’s Chips)

Intel has been in the headlines again. SoftBank is pledging $2 billion into its AI ecosystem. Uncle Sam is stepping in with a chips grant that could amount to a 10% equivalent ā€œstakeā€ in Intel’s future. On the surface, this looks like a comeback story.

But let me be blunt: when a company needs both a Japanese tech conglomerate and the U.S. government to hold it up, that’s not a sign of strength. It’s a flashing red light. Intel isn’t staging a renaissance — it’s on life support.

Let’s break it down.

šŸ“‰ Financial Reality Check

Intel’s Q2 2025 earnings tell you everything you need to know. Revenue came in at $12.9 billion, down from $13.3 billion a year ago. EPS slipped to $0.18, missing analyst expectations. Data center revenue — the crown jewel in the AI age — dropped 7% year-over-year. Gross margins sank below 40%, levels that would’ve been unthinkable in Intel’s glory days.

Compare that with Nvidia’s margins at 74% or even AMD’s at 50%+. The gap isn’t just wide — it’s embarrassing. And in semiconductors, margins equal power. The more you make per chip, the more you can reinvest in design, fabs, and talent. Intel is simply outgunned.

Cash? Intel’s balance sheet looks strained. Free cash flow was negative $5 billion last quarter, thanks to its fab-heavy spending spree. This isn’t investment from strength — it’s desperation to catch up.

šŸ›ļø Uncle Sam’s ā€œStakeā€ Isn’t Comforting

The U.S. government stepping in with a chips grant — effectively backstopping Intel’s strategic importance with taxpayer dollars — is painted as a win. But here’s the reality: when Washington has to own part of your future, it usually means Wall Street doesn’t want to.

Intel receiving what amounts to a 10% support stake isn’t a vote of confidence. It’s a bailout wrapped in patriotic branding.

And let’s be real: if the U.S. government is worried about keeping Intel alive, the situation is probably worse than we think. You don’t call in Uncle Sam unless private capital won’t foot the bill.

šŸ¤– SoftBank’s $2B Doesn’t Change the Game

SoftBank has pledged $2 billion into AI infrastructure, and Intel will get a piece of that pie. Great headline, sure. But zoom in: SoftBank’s Vision Fund has lit billions on fire before (WeWork, anyone?). This isn’t the cavalry.

And even if SoftBank funnels $500M–$1B into Intel partnerships, it’s a drop in the bucket compared to the $30B+ Nvidia is pouring into R&D and partnerships annually. AMD is quietly picking up share in AI accelerators, and TSMC — the true kingmaker — is booked solid with Nvidia and Apple. Intel is, at best, catching crumbs.

This isn’t leadership. It’s survival.

šŸ•°ļø Too Little, Too Late

Intel still controls fabs, and yes, its foundry ambitions could eventually pay off. But the timing is brutal. By the time Intel rolls out its next-gen nodes, TSMC will already be two steps ahead at 2nm.

AI workloads today are running on Nvidia’s H100s, Blackwell GPUs, and soon Rubin chips. AMD’s MI350 series is finding traction. Intel’s Gaudi accelerators? They’re niche at best. Market share is low single digits.

History tells us in semis, once you lose the lead, you rarely get it back. Ask GlobalFoundries. Ask IBM Microelectronics. The game moves too fast.

šŸ’” The Bigger Picture for Investors

Here’s the gut punch: Intel is still a laggard stock in a leader-driven industry.

  • Nvidia is up almost 100% in the past year.

  • AMD is up ~45%.

  • TSMC hit an all-time high this quarter.

  • Intel? It’s still down 60% from its 2021 peak and trading at around $25/share.

The smart money isn’t betting on Intel’s revival. It’s betting on the players driving AI demand today — not tomorrow, not five years from now.

Yes, you could buy Intel and hope for a slow turnaround. But every dollar parked there is a dollar not compounding in Nvidia, AMD, or even the AI software layer where margins are fat and adoption is explosive. That’s the real opportunity cost.

🚨 Takeaway

Intel isn’t a comeback story — it’s a cautionary tale. Government lifelines and SoftBank partnerships make headlines, but they don’t fix fundamentals. Revenue is shrinking, margins are collapsing, and Intel’s AI relevance is marginal.

For me, the takeaway is simple: don’t confuse noise with strength. In a market where capital chases momentum and dominance compounds, Intel is still on the wrong side of history.

šŸ‘‰ If you’re holding Intel waiting for a miracle, ask yourself: what’s the price of staying stuck while Nvidia, AMD, and TSMC sprint ahead?

TOGETHER WITH OUR PARTNER

Choose the Right AI Tools

With thousands of AI tools available, how do you know which ones are worth your money? Subscribe to Mindstream and get our expert guide comparing 40+ popular AI tools. Discover which free options rival paid versions and when upgrading is essential. Stop overspending on tools you don't need and find the perfect AI stack for your workflow.

🧠 Final Word

The market loves a headline. A $2 billion SoftBank stake, a 10% government lifeline, or a flashy partnership — it all sounds like momentum. But I’ve learned over the years that when a stock needs this much external scaffolding, it usually signals more weakness than strength. When the government steps in, it isn’t a badge of confidence — it’s often a quiet admission that the situation is worse than investors realize.

That’s why I keep my stance on Intel clear: until the company proves it can execute without bailouts and subsidies, it remains a stock I’d rather observe than own. There’s no need to chase noise. Real investing discipline means letting the market spin its story while you stay anchored to the numbers, the execution, and the long-term edge. That’s where conviction is built — not in the hype, but in the patience to wait until the story actually changes.

Stay Sharp,

— AK

Disclaimer: The content on this blog is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. Investing in the stock market involves risks, including the loss of principal. The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not represent any company or organization. Readers should conduct their own research and due diligence before making any financial decisions. The author and publisher are not responsible for any losses or damages resulting from the use of this information.

Reply

or to participate.