Midweek Deep Dive: 🚨 Everyone Missed The Real $160 Alibaba Story

🌞 Good Morning, Folks!

Everyone is obsessing over inflation prints, rate-cut timing, and whether tech’s rally is “over.” But the real story isn’t in macro charts — it’s in who’s quietly bleeding while another player sharpens their blade.

Last week, Meituan’s CEO called Alibaba’s subsidies “irrational.” The market shrugged it off as noise. To me, that’s the tell. Leaders don’t burn airtime unless they feel the ground shifting under them.

For months, the consensus was simple: Alibaba was a broken giant, left behind by regulators and overtaken by hungrier rivals. But here’s the problem with consensus — it calcifies just as the story changes.

When you dig into what’s happening, it isn’t irrational at all. It’s surgical. Every yuan in subsidies isn’t a loss — it’s leverage. Alibaba isn’t competing on discounts, it’s rewiring consumer behavior in real time.

This week, while headlines blared about global rates and tech valuations, the real war was being fought in China’s streets — at the checkout counter, on delivery apps, and inside ecosystems that don’t make headlines until they’ve already reshaped markets.

And that’s where we’re going today. In This Week’s Focus, I’ll break down Alibaba’s renewed assault on JD and Meituan — why Jack Ma’s return changes the psychology of the fight, and why what looks like irrational spending is actually the most rational power play on the board.

This isn’t about chasing hype. It’s about spotting the signal hiding inside the noise — before the crowd wakes up to it.

🌐 From Around the Web

📉 Jobless Expansion: Weak Jobs = Bullish Case in Disguise
The “jobless expansion” narrative is getting traction: weak or slowing job growth is increasingly seen as a trigger for Fed rate cuts. Most folks view weak jobs as bad news—smart money is trading it as a potential boost to valuations. If you ignore this, you’ll be calling for cuts after they’re priced in, not before.

🔄 TikTok Ban Averted? U.S.-China Cut Deal Framework
A framework agreement between the U.S. and China might spare TikTok from a full ban, under conditions of revised ownership and operational control. It’s a political headline, but for markets this matters: regulatory risk—not just in tech, but in geopolitics—is a variable that can move capital fast. Missing this part means misreading who stands vulnerable in portfolios betting on regulatory safe zones.

🤖 Alphabet Double-Downs On AI: $6.8B Investment In U.K.
Google is committing nearly $7B over two years to deepen its AI presence in the U.K., signaling that the AI arms race is shifting from “who launches first” to “who can globalize infrastructure and regulation immune zones.” While everyone’s eyes are on Nvidia, this kind of geographical spread often separates winners from those who peak early. Overlook this, and you might own a headline-champ but a long-tail laggard.

TOGETHER WITH OUR PARTNER

The #1 AI Newsletter for Business Leaders

Join 400,000+ executives and professionals who trust The AI Report for daily, practical AI updates.

Built for business—not engineers—this newsletter delivers expert prompts, real-world use cases, and decision-ready insights.

No hype. No jargon. Just results.

Subscribe free—trusted by leaders

🔍 This Week’s Focus: Alibaba vs. JD & Meituan - The War for China’s Consumers

For most of the last three years, Alibaba looked like it had lost its edge.

While Beijing’s regulators hammered Chinese tech giants, JD.com quietly built its reputation on logistics speed and reliability. Meituan cemented itself as the go-to app for food delivery and local services, turning daily consumer habits into market dominance.

Alibaba - once untouchable - was shrinking. Its market share slipped, its aura faded, and its founder, Jack Ma, had all but disappeared.

But the battlefield has shifted.

Jack Ma has quietly reemerged, and Alibaba has unleashed a strategy so aggressive that rivals are calling it “irrational” in public. Subsidies are pouring into every corner of China’s consumer economy, daily order volumes are exploding, and for the first time in years, JD and Meituan look rattled.

This isn’t just another price war. This is Alibaba trying to reprogram the habits of 1.4 billion people - and in the process, take back the crown it once wore.

💰 The Subsidy War Erupts

Alibaba’s recent moves make one thing clear: it’s no longer content to defend its turf.

• RMB 1 billion (~$140M) in subsidies were unleashed through its Amap app in September, targeting ride-hailing, food delivery, and lifestyle services across 300 cities.

• RMB 50 billion (~$7B) has been committed to Taobao Instant Commerce (Shangou) - the new instant delivery platform that promises groceries, meals, and everyday essentials within 60 minutes.

• Within its first month, Shangou hit 40 million daily orders, putting it within striking distance of Meituan’s stronghold.

For JD and Meituan, this isn’t business as usual. Subsidies at this scale force them into a corner: either match Alibaba yuan-for-yuan and bleed cash, or cede market share to a rival with deeper pockets.

That’s why Meituan’s CEO has been on the defensive, describing Alibaba’s moves as “irrational.” It’s the clearest tell you’ll ever get in business: when the leader complains, it means they’re under pressure.

⚔️ How Alibaba Lost Its Edge - and Why It Wants It Back

Understanding this fight requires looking back.

Alibaba once dominated China’s e-commerce with Taobao and Tmall. But while Alibaba focused on its traditional marketplace model, JD doubled down on logistics. JD built out warehouses, trucks, and delivery systems so efficient that Chinese consumers began to trust it more for big-ticket and time-sensitive purchases.

At the same time, Meituan owned the “daily habit” layer. Food delivery, local services, and restaurant bookings gave it an intimacy with consumers that Alibaba lacked. By 2022, Meituan controlled nearly 50% of China’s instant commerce market, compared to Alibaba’s low 40s.

Then came Beijing’s regulatory crackdown. Alibaba was fined, restructured, and politically sidelined. JD and Meituan kept advancing.

Today, Alibaba’s offensive isn’t just about growth. It’s about survival - and pride. For Jack Ma, this is a battle to restore Alibaba as the operating system of Chinese life.

🧠 Behavioral Warfare, Not Just Discounts

Most Western investors misunderstand what’s happening. They see “subsidies” and assume Alibaba is lighting cash on fire. But this isn’t just a financial arms race - it’s psychological warfare.

Here’s how it works:

• Hook: A consumer orders a meal for 30% less on Taobao Shangou.

• Habit: The delivery arrives within 45 minutes, fast enough to trust.

• Lock-in: The consumer links payments through Alipay, sees discounts in Amap navigation, and begins defaulting to Alibaba’s ecosystem without thinking.

Subsidies aren’t about one-off orders. They’re about conditioning behavior at scale. Once habits are wired, even small discounts keep users loyal.

This is what Amazon did with Prime in the U.S. It wasn’t about free shipping; it was about making consumers feel irrational to shop anywhere else. Alibaba is now running that playbook in real time, with billions in firepower.

⚖️ The Jack Ma Factor

Jack Ma’s quiet reemergence adds a layer of symbolism and strategy. After years of absence following Beijing’s regulatory assault, Ma has been spotted again - and reports suggest he’s playing a more active role in shaping Alibaba’s direction.

For investors, Ma’s presence signals two things:

1. Political cover - The worst of the regulatory storm appears to have passed. His visibility is a sign that Alibaba is back in Beijing’s good graces, or at least no longer on the blacklist.

2. Strategic aggression - Ma has always thought in ecosystems, not products. His influence likely explains the push to stitch Shangou, Amap, Alipay, and Taobao into one seamless consumer network.

This isn’t about chasing quarterly profits. It’s about rebuilding dominance brick by brick, habit by habit, until Alibaba is again the default choice for Chinese consumers.

👀 Signs the Tide Is Turning

So how can we tell if Alibaba’s war is working? Watch for these markers:

• Public panic from rivals - Already happening. Meituan’s leaders calling subsidies “irrational” is evidence of pressure.

• Market share shifts - If Shangou pushes past 40M daily orders and starts gaining ground quarter after quarter, the tide is turning.

• Cross-platform lock-in - Look for consumers using multiple Alibaba services together: ordering groceries on Shangou, paying with Alipay, navigating with Amap. That’s ecosystem dominance in action.

• Singles’ Day (11.11) performance - This year’s shopping festival will be the clearest signal of whether subsidies are turning into sticky loyalty.

If these signals flash green, JD and Meituan will be fighting uphill with fewer resources and less political goodwill.

🚨 The Bottom Line

Alibaba isn’t just spending. It’s weaponizing subsidies to rewire consumer behavior, claw back lost ground, and position itself as the indispensable layer of Chinese daily life.

JD and Meituan remain formidable, but they face a brutal dilemma: spend heavily to defend their turf and risk bleeding margins, or retreat and watch Alibaba march back into dominance.

Jack Ma’s return changes the psychology of the fight. His presence signals vision, long-term focus, and a willingness to endure short-term pain for a decade of power.

The real risk for investors isn’t that Alibaba’s strategy drains resources. The real risk is that it works - so well that JD and Meituan get trapped in a subsidy war they can’t win, while Alibaba rewires Chinese consumers back into its ecosystem.

If that happens, today’s market cap won’t just look cheap. It will look like the moment everyone else underestimated the return of a giant.

Position accordingly.

TOGETHER WITH OUR PARTNER

Run ads IRL with AdQuick

With AdQuick, you can now easily plan, deploy and measure campaigns just as easily as digital ads, making them a no-brainer to add to your team’s toolbox.

You can learn more at www.AdQuick.com

🧠 Final Word

Markets right now feel like they’re built on noise — analysts arguing about whether subsidies are “irrational,” traders obsessing over short-term margins, and investors caught between fear of missing out and fear of getting burned. It’s the kind of backdrop where conviction gets tested, because the headlines always make the fight look scarier than the strategy behind it.

What I remind myself in moments like this is simple: companies win not by playing quarters, but by reshaping behavior and outlasting rivals. That’s what Alibaba is doing. Whether you like China risk or not, the principle is the same everywhere — the side willing to take short-term pain for long-term dominance usually walks away with the prize. The job isn’t to guess every headline; it’s to recognize when the game being played is bigger than the quarter in front of you.